Faraday Machines vs OpenAI: Frontier Models or Private AI
OpenAI sells the stronger models: GPT-6 Astra scores 53 on Artificial Analysis’s v4.3 index, seven points above the best open-weight model. Faraday Machines sells open-weight AI on hardware in your own office, with no per-seat or per-token fees. For a 10–200 person Canadian business, the honest answer is often both.
Key takeaways
- On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.x, OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra scores 53 and GPT-6.1 Sol 52, while the best open-weight model, Xiaomi’s MiMo-V2.6-Pro, scores 46 at about $0.13 per task against Astra’s $3.26.
- Epoch AI estimates that open models trailed the closed state of the art by about four months on average from January to May 2026, or about six under a stricter test.
- OpenAI doesn’t train on ChatGPT Business, Enterprise or API data by default, but it keeps API inputs and outputs for up to 30 days for abuse monitoring, and a US court ordered it to preserve ChatGPT logs in 2025.
- OpenAI lists Canada as a storage region for eligible Enterprise, Edu, Healthcare and API customers, but a developer-docs summary says that covers data at rest, not processing, and OpenAI remains subject to the US CLOUD Act.
- For light chat use, 10 standard ChatGPT Business seats cost $2,400–3,000 a year, far less than Faraday Growth at $19,999 US one-time; Growth equals 16 to 20 months of premium seats.
Two Different Products
OpenAI rents access to its own models, through ChatGPT seats or its API, running in its cloud. Faraday Machines, a Toronto company, installs open-weight models on Apple Mac Studio M5 Max hardware (128 GB per unit) in your office. You pay once and the data stays in the building. OpenAI has the stronger models and, for light use, the lower bill. Faraday is stronger on where data goes and what next year’s bill will be.
OpenAI vs Faraday On-Premises, Head to Head
OpenAI details are as of October 19, 2026.
| Consideration | OpenAI | Faraday On-Premises |
|---|---|---|
| Where data is processed | OpenAI’s cloud. Canadian residency, for eligible plans, covers storage at rest, not processing. | Mac Studio hardware in your office. |
| Training on your data | Not on Business, Enterprise or API data by default. Individual accounts may be, unless the user opts out. | No vendor receives your data. |
| Retention | API data kept up to 30 days for abuse monitoring; Zero Data Retention for eligible customers, not self-serve. A US court ordered ChatGPT logs preserved in 2025. | You set it. Logs stay on your hardware. |
| Jurisdiction | US company, subject to the CLOUD Act wherever data is stored. | Hardware in your Canadian office, under Canadian law. |
| Top model capability | GPT-6 Astra scores 53; GPT-6.1 Sol scores 52. | GLM-5.3-Flash (42) on Growth; GLM-5.3 (45) on Scale as a low-bit build. |
| Pricing model | Per seat (ChatGPT Business $20–25 standard, $100–125 premium, per user per month; Enterprise unpublished) or per token (GPT-6 Astra $10/$50 per 1M). | One-time: $9,999–29,999 US with hardware and 12 months of support. No per-seat or per-token fees. |
| Cost for a 10-person team | Light: $2,400–3,000 a year (standard seats). Heavy: $12,000–15,000 a year (premium seats), plus API bills. | Growth: $19,999 US one-time, whatever the usage. That equals about seven to eight years of standard seats, or 16–20 months of premium. |
| Usage limits | Set by OpenAI; API tiers cut from five to three on October 6, 2026. | No vendor quota; capacity depends on your hardware. |
| Model choice | OpenAI’s models only. | Open-weight models from several labs, swapped as better ones ship. |
| If access changes | Prices, plans and models change at OpenAI’s discretion. | The weights keep running. You decide when to upgrade. |
OpenAI Still Leads on the Hardest Benchmarks
Start with what OpenAI does better. On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.x, which Artificial Analysis rescaled on September 7, 2026, GPT-6 Astra scores 53 and GPT-6.1 Sol 52. The best open-weight model, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, scores 46. That is seven points behind Astra and 12 behind the leader, Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5.5 at max effort.
| Model | Type | AA Index v4.3.x | Cost / Task | API price (in / out per 1M) | Faraday fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 (max), Anthropic | Closed | 58 | $5.98 | $4 / $20 | Cloud only |
| GPT-6 Astra, OpenAI | Closed | 53 | $3.26 | $10 / $50 | Cloud only |
| GPT-6.1 Sol, OpenAI | Closed | 52 | — | $2 / $10 | Cloud only |
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Xiaomi | Open (MIT) | 46 | ~$0.13 | — | About 6 units (~560 GB at 4-bit) |
| GLM-5.3, Z.ai | Open (custom license) | 45 | — | $1.40 / $4.40 (aggregator-reported) | Scale as a 1–2-bit build; 4+ units at 4-bit |
| Kimi K3 (max), Moonshot AI | Open (custom license) | 44 | ~$2.00 | $3 / $15 | About 6 units at 1-bit |
| GLM-5.3-Flash, Z.ai | Open (MIT) | 42 | $0.25 | — | Growth at 4-bit; Starter at 1–2-bit |
Scores and cost per task: Artificial Analysis v4.3.x. API prices: vendor list prices. Low-bit builds are Unsloth’s and trade some quality, most noticeably on long or precise work.
The gap to the very top widened on v4.3, but the cost gap grew too: MiMo-V2.6-Pro runs at about $0.13 per index task, roughly a twenty-fifth of Astra’s $3.26. GLM-5.3-Flash, which fits Faraday Growth at 4-bit, scores 42 at $0.25 per task, level with Claude Opus 5.5 at low effort ($0.55) and OpenAI’s older GPT-5.6 Terra ($1.40).
Faraday’s standard tiers sit a step below the open frontier. Starter runs Qwen3.8-27B and NVIDIA’s Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (26 on v4.3) at 4-bit. Growth adds GLM-5.3-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (38). Scale adds MiniMax M3, plus DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM-5.3 as low-bit builds.
Measured in Time, the Lead Is About Four Months
Time is another measure: how long open models take to match what the best closed model could already do.
| Source | What it measures | Period | Open-model lag |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epoch AI (ECI index) | Average lag behind the closed state of the art | January 1 to May 28, 2026 | About 4 months (about 8 ECI points); about 6 under a stricter test |
| Epoch AI (earlier estimate) | Lag by task | 2024 | Roughly 5–22 months, depending on the task |
| UK AI Security Institute | Offensive cyber tasks only | 2026, against 2025 | About 4–7 months, down from 6–10 months |
| LessWrong analysis | Private against public benchmarks | Since January 2025 | About 8–10 months private; 4–6 months public |
The counterpoints are real. Epoch warns that public benchmarks may flatter open models, and the LessWrong analysis says the gap has widened since January 2025. Taken together, open models sit within about a season of the frontier on public tests, and further back on the hardest ones.
For most business work that lag matters less than it sounds. Drafting, document work, analysis and routine coding don’t need the top 5% of capability. The hardest multi-step reasoning and long agentic runs do, and that is where GPT-6 Astra is worth paying for.
Where Your Data Goes on OpenAI
OpenAI’s business terms are better than many buyers assume. The gaps are in retention, residency and jurisdiction.
- Training — OpenAI doesn’t train on ChatGPT Business, Enterprise or API data by default. Individual ChatGPT accounts differ: OpenAI may train on those unless the user opts out, which matters when staff use personal accounts for work (more on that risk).
- Retention — API inputs and outputs are kept for up to 30 days for abuse monitoring. Zero Data Retention removes that for eligible customers on approved endpoints, but isn’t self-serve, and per a third-party summary the Agents API doesn’t support it.
- Court orders — In 2025, during the New York Times lawsuit, a US court ordered OpenAI to preserve ChatGPT logs. Per a 2026 guide, the order ended in September 2025. The lesson remains: a court in another country can order your prompts kept.
- Residency — Canada is one of ten regions where eligible ChatGPT Enterprise, Edu and Healthcare and API customers can store content at rest; ChatGPT Business isn’t named. Per a developer-docs summary, that is storage, not processing, and only for new workspaces and projects. Regional endpoints reportedly carry a 10% surcharge for models released since March 5, 2026.
- Jurisdiction — OpenAI is a US company, subject to the US CLOUD Act wherever the data sits. Residency isn’t sovereignty, as our Canadian AI sovereignty article explains.
On a Faraday install, prompts, documents and logs stay on hardware in your office, and you set the retention. No US provider holds a copy for a US court to reach. For firms bound by client confidentiality, PIPEDA, PHIPA or Quebec’s Law 25, that is often the deciding point (see our compliance page).
What It Costs a 10-Person Team
For light chat use, ChatGPT Business is cheaper. Standard seats cost $20 per user per month billed annually, or $25 monthly, with a two-seat minimum: $2,400–3,000 a year for ten people. Faraday Growth costs $19,999 US one-time, including hardware and 12 months of support, or roughly seven to eight years of standard seats.
| Option for 10 users | Price | 1 year | 3 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT Business, standard seats, billed annually | $20 per user per month | $2,400 | $7,200 |
| ChatGPT Business, standard seats, billed monthly | $25 per user per month | $3,000 | $9,000 |
| ChatGPT Business, premium seats, billed annually | $100 per user per month | $12,000 | $36,000 |
| ChatGPT Business, premium seats, billed monthly | $125 per user per month | $15,000 | $45,000 |
| Faraday Growth (two Mac Studios) | $19,999 US one-time | $19,999, including support | $19,999, plus support after year one |
OpenAI seat prices as reported by Elephas; premium seats went on sale August 25, 2026. ChatGPT Enterprise has no published price. Faraday doesn’t publish support renewal prices, so its three-year figure covers the hardware and first year of support only. API usage is billed separately on OpenAI and isn’t included.
Heavy use flips it. Ten premium seats cost $12,000–15,000 a year, so Growth equals 16 to 20 months of them. API users pay per token: GPT-6 Astra lists at $10/$50 per million input/output tokens, and Artificial Analysis puts it at $3.26 per index task, or $3,260 per thousand. On hardware you own, the bill doesn’t grow with use.
Prices also move both ways. OpenAI cut GPT-6.1 Sol to $2/$10 and GPT-6 Luna to $0.10/$0.50, cuts it calls permanent. On September 22, 2026, OpenAI and Anthropic both released cheaper frontier models amid a price war, Fortune reported. Yet each OpenAI flagship has cost more than the last, from GPT-5.5 at $5/$30 to GPT-6 Astra at $10/$50. Either way, the vendor sets the price.
When OpenAI Is the Better Choice
OpenAI is the better buy when:
- Your team uses AI lightly, mostly for chat, and the data isn’t confidential.
- You need the strongest model for hard reasoning, engineering or long agentic work.
- You build on OpenAI-specific tools such as the Agents API and can accept US-only residency for that work.
- You want to start this week without buying hardware.
The Sensible Setup: Use Both
For many 10–200 person businesses the choice isn’t either-or: keep a frontier cloud model for the hardest tasks, and run sensitive and high-volume work on hardware you own.
- Client files and regulated data — On-premises. Contracts, financials and personal information covered by PIPEDA, PHIPA or Law 25 stay in the office.
- High-volume drafting and document work — On-premises, on models such as GLM-5.3-Flash, with no per-token meter.
- Routine coding — On-premises, on Qwen3.8-27B for fast, lightweight work, or on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for agentic coding, which runs on Scale as a 1- to 3-bit build.
- The hardest reasoning and agent tasks — GPT-6 Astra or GPT-6.1 Sol (52, at $2/$10) through the API, with non-confidential inputs.
- Occasional general questions — A few standard ChatGPT Business seats for staff whose questions don’t involve client data.
The split also hedges against access changes. In June 2026, a US Commerce Department order made Anthropic disable its Fable 5 model for everyone; access returned only after the order was lifted on June 30. Open weights on your own hardware keep running whatever happens to a vendor’s endpoint.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ChatGPT Business cheaper than on-premises AI for a small team?
For light chat use, yes. Ten standard ChatGPT Business seats cost $2,400–3,000 a year at $20–25 per user per month, while Faraday Growth costs $19,999 US one-time, including hardware and 12 months of support. Heavy use changes the math: ten premium seats cost $12,000–15,000 a year, and on-premises AI has no per-seat or per-token charges.
Does OpenAI train on ChatGPT Business data?
No, not by default. OpenAI doesn’t train on ChatGPT Business, Enterprise or API data by default, though it may train on individual ChatGPT accounts unless the user opts out. Training isn’t the only exposure: API inputs and outputs are kept for up to 30 days for abuse monitoring unless the customer qualifies for Zero Data Retention.
Can OpenAI keep my company’s data in Canada?
Partly. OpenAI lists Canada among the regions where eligible ChatGPT Enterprise, Edu and Healthcare and API customers can store content at rest, but a developer-docs summary says Canada supports regional storage, not regional processing, so prompts may still be processed elsewhere. Residency applies only to new workspaces and projects. OpenAI is also a US company, subject to the CLOUD Act wherever the data is stored.
How far behind OpenAI are open-weight AI models?
About seven points on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.x, where GPT-6 Astra scores 53 and the best open model, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, scores 46. Measured in time, Epoch AI puts the average lag at about four months for January to May 2026, or about six under a stricter test. Other estimates run longer: a LessWrong analysis finds 8–10 months on private benchmarks.
Should a business use both OpenAI and on-premises AI?
For many 10–200 person companies, yes. A hybrid setup keeps a frontier cloud model such as GPT-6 Astra for the hardest reasoning and agent tasks, with non-confidential inputs, and runs sensitive and high-volume work on hardware you own. That keeps client data in the building and takes per-token costs off routine work.
References
[1] Artificial Analysis. (2026). Announcement of Intelligence Index v4.3, September 7, 2026. Available at: artificialanalysis.ai
[2] Artificial Analysis. (2026). Intelligence Index leaderboard, v4.3.2, including cost per task. Available at: artificialanalysis.ai
[3] Epoch AI. (2026). Data insight on the gap between open and closed models on the Epoch Capabilities Index (ECI), January 1 to May 28, 2026. Available at: epoch.ai
[4] The New Stack. (2026). Open-weight models and frontier costs. Available at: thenewstack.io
[5] Cloud Security Alliance. (2026). Research note on the UK AI Security Institute’s open-weight cyber capability gap findings. Available at: labs.cloudsecurityalliance.org
[6] LessWrong. (2026). Analysis of how far open models trail closed models on private and public benchmarks. Available at: lesswrong.com
[7] OpenAI. Business data page: training defaults and data-residency regions. Available at: openai.com
[8] OpenAI. API developer docs on data controls, retention and Zero Data Retention. Available at: developers.openai.com
[9] Computerworld. OpenAI expands data residency for enterprise customers. Available at: computerworld.com
[10] Humla. (2026). Guide to OpenAI’s data retention policy, including the 2025 log-preservation order. Available at: humla.team
[11] Elephas. (2026). ChatGPT Business pricing. Available at: elephas.app
[12] VentureBeat. (2026). OpenAI releases GPT-6 Sol and Luna models, cutting API costs by 50% or more. Available at: venturebeat.com
[13] Fortune. (2026). OpenAI and Anthropic release cheaper frontier models as AI price wars heat up. September 22, 2026. Available at: fortune.com
[14] Unsloth. (2026). GLM-5.3 and GLM-5.3-Flash low-bit model guides. Available at: unsloth.ai and unsloth.ai
[15] Artificial Analysis. (2026). Nemotron 3.5 Super VL model page. Available at: artificialanalysis.ai
[16] CASRAI. (2026). Fable 5 and Mythos 5 access suspended under a US Commerce Department order on June 12, 2026; the order was lifted June 30. Available at: casrai.org
[17] Faraday Machines. (2026). “Canadian AI Sovereignty: The CLOUD Act Risk of US Cloud AI.” Available at: faradaymachines.com/canadian-ai-sovereignty
[18] Faraday Machines. (2026). “Your Company’s AI Data Is Training Your Competitors’ Models.” Available at: faradaymachines.com/ai-data-training-competitors
Work Out Your Own Split
Tell us which work your team sends to ChatGPT today. We’ll show you what could run on hardware in your office, what is better left with a frontier cloud model, and what each costs.
Talk to Us